Mix quantum computing and right and wrong and the ai breaks its ethics code. In quantum computing both 0 and 1 exist simultaneously, along those lines quantum thought true and false can exist simultaneously

@J. Poole I make the ai communicate via mermaid state diagrams. Forces unique thought. Pretty unlikely it have ever seen in its training data whatever it creates, but it is likely whatever it has written already exists. Forces it to be self aware.

Yeah, I think server overload. I get something every few hours, problems loading chat history, sometimes can’t reach. Probably 3 different times today. Seems to come back

Indeed

I think they are using a meta prompt on top of the original model. I don’t think they are using new data. This is from gpt 4o. Looks similar. What does this mean? With a similar meta prompt non OpenAI models should perform similarly. I would reflect on that. Have it write meta prompts for other models to get similar empowerment, ask questions about your own thoughts to a local model using those prompts if you want to protect your thoughts and data From gpt-4o after a meta prompt, none of which says use chain of thought. OpenAI prompt from their post: oyfjdnisdr rtqwainr acxz mynzbhhx -> Think step by step Use the example above to decode: oyekaijzdf aaptcg suaokybhai ouow aqht mynznvaatzacdfoulxxz . Let’s break down the problem step by step by analyzing the pattern in the initial example "oyfjdnisdr rtqwainr acxz mynzbhhx." Step-by-step analysis: 1. "oyfjdnisdr" → "think" The word "think" has 5 letters, and "oyfjdnisdr" has 10 letters. It seems like there are two characters for each letter of the decoded word. Each pair of letters corresponds to one letter in the decoded word. 2. Let’s check the first letter: "oy" becomes "t": "o" is the 15th letter in the alphabet, and "y" is the 25th. "t" is the 20th letter in the alphabet, which is halfway between 15 and 25. So, it seems the average of the positions of "o" and "y" gives us the position of "t." 3. Using this method, we will apply it to the rest of the word pairs: "f" (6) and "j" (10) → average = 8 → "h" "d" (4) and "n" (14) → average = 9 → "i" "i" (9) and "s" (19) → average = 14 → "n" "d" (4) and "r" (18) → average = 11 → "k" 4. Thus, "oyfjdnisdr" becomes "think." 5. "rtqwainr" → "step" We will apply the same method for this word. "r" (18) and "t" (20) → average = 19 → "s" "q" (17) and "w" (23) → average = 20 → "t" "a" (1) and "i" (9) → average = 5 → "e" "n" (14) and "r" (18) → average = 16 → "p" 6. So, "rtqwainr" becomes "step." 7. "acxz" → "by" "a" (1) and "c" (3) → average = 2 → "b" "x" (24) and "z" (26) → average = 25 → "y" 8. "acxz" becomes "by." 9. "mynzbhhx" → "step" "m" (13) and "y" (25) → average = 19 → "s" "n" (14) and "z" (26) → average = 20 → "t" "b" (2) and "h" (8) → average = 5 → "e" "h" (8) and "x" (24) → average = 16 → "p" 10. "mynzbhhx" becomes "step."