Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

MapVantage

Private • 81 • Free

RainmakerAI

Private • 1.3k • Free

Community Builders - Free

Private • 1.9k • Free

Super Affiliate Academy (FREE)

Private • 3.9k • Free

MapsLiftoff

Public • 49 • Free

2 contributions to MapsLiftoff
Map Pack Rankings
What is everyone using for finding the geo grid rankings? Local falcon, local brand manager, etc... And what radius or miles on the grid size box?
2
7
New comment 14h ago
1 like • 28d
I use local brand manager and I've contacted PM NOW marketing agency where they've provided me a report as well. They specifically use a larger 10 mi grid report than what I use on the 13 x 13 1 mile ans 2 mile I guess their way of saying you don't rank.
0 likes • 26d
@Mike Clay what grid size are you using for very competitive cities?
About the law firm that just wouldn't rank
I once worked with an agency client managing 11 different law firms. As part of my service, I conducted a detailed website audit for each firm, pointing out critical changes they needed to make to boost their maps rankings. Most of the lawyers jumped on board and had no problem with their agency making the necessary adjustments. Once those changes were made? Their rankings went through the roof. We are talking super competitive terms in cities like San Diego, Miami and Austin. But one lawyer was different. He refused to implement the recommendations because he liked how his website was set up. I could understand that—people get attached to how their site looks—but his maps rankings were stagnant and every time a new Google update hit, they would drop. Nothing we tried was working. We experimented with a few other different strategies, but no matter what we did, the results just didn’t come. After a few months of frustration, I decided to send the site to @Mike Clay for his input. He took one look and confirmed what I had suspected all along—the issue was the site’s structure. It was far too flat. The pages weren’t organized in a way that gave Google a clear picture of what this firm really did. In fact, Google saw their pages about paralegals as just as important as their main services! The problem was that the site didn’t have a proper SILO structure, meaning there wasn’t enough topical relevance or depth for Google to understand what this firm really did. Without a robust structure, Google couldn’t prioritize their most important pages, so they weren’t ranking for their key terms. And most people think well...this is just a website ranking issue. But, this directly tied into their ability to rank in maps. The two are very connected. The moral of the story? If you want to rank, you need more than just a good-looking site. Your website needs depth. It needs structure. Google needs a clear, organized view of who you are, what you do, and where you’re located. A strong foundation with a deep, relevant SILO is what truly helps you rank and get the attention you deserve
2
7
New comment Oct 4
0 likes • Oct 1
@Mike Clay i meant mydomain.com/roof-repair/city... .com/window-installer/town, etc
0 likes • Oct 1
@Mike Clay so, is there a new work around? I heard putting up a page with 90% of the services sprinkled with main service and adding cities in content area. What happens if your client wants to be the juggernaut for all services?
1-2 of 2
Jon Daniel
1
2points to level up
@jon-daniel-1428
Marketeer

Active 5d ago
Joined Sep 26, 2024
powered by