Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Facilitator Club (Free)

Private • 6.9k • Free

Lifetime Trusted Advisors

Private • 1k • Free

Product Synthesis

Public • 96 • Free

C.R.E.A.T. Entrepreneurs

Private • 161 • $9/m

6 contributions to Product Synthesis
Remarkable (2)
Has anyone used Remarkable (2) before? Is it worth the price? I struggle to see it's full value and every-day usage. What are your thoughts?
2
5
New comment May 14
1 like • Mar 5
I have tried from a friend for a couple of days. It is quite cool and nice. However, I personally prefer an ipad and a note taking app like goodnotes (or similar).
1 like • May 14
@Kristi Shumway I really like writing and taking notes on ipad. I use Goodnotes as notetaking app, i tried a couple and this one is my fav so far. But i have not yet upgraded to the subscription version. What also made a big difference for me as writing experience was to use the paperlike screen protector for ipad. It adds some drag and it feels very close to paper. I haven’t used remarkable extensively so i can’t really compare. For me the ipad offers more flexibility. Let me know what you end up choosing :)
Are products business models going back to "traditional" ?
I need to put some thoughts down in writing and I would love to hear your thoughts. A few "modern tech companies / startups", in an attempt to pursue profits or profitability are introducing changes to their business model. The examples I have in mind are: - Netflix (re)introducing subscriptions with advertising and expecting it will be the most profitable - Amazon Prime Video doing the same with advertising - Uber extending into more traditional "car rental" The pressure for profitability or at least the pressure companies feel to show they have a plan to be financially sustainable is understandable in the current economy. High interest rates, make borrowing expensive and reduce the appetite for high-risk investment for VCs and the like. So companies looking for financing need to show their numbers are solid. Amazon does not seem to have "profitability issues" overall, and maybe this move only applies to streaming services. What about Uber? What I find surprising (but at the same time is to be expected) is that companies that have been "disruptive" turn to more traditional ways to secure revenues: i.e. advertising as on TV. Maybe this was a long time in the making or it is the first response in a time of crisis where investors and shareholders would respond more favourably to a business model that they understand and it is has been proven to work in the past. Or maybe these companies have failed to create new ways to secure revenues and be profitable and the current economy has just accelerated a return to "old ways" that was already inevitable. I using the word "traditional" here for lack of a better one. I use it to designate business models that have been around for decades like advertising on TV and have been proven by incumbent companies. What do you think? Do you have more examples of this trend or examples that go against it? Do you see the same trend? Do you think it is here to stay or is it only a temporary response? Is this a sign that when companies become mature they do not have much choice but to conform to "traditional" business models?
3
4
New comment Mar 5
1 like • Mar 5
@Matthias Jakubek I think you are spot on when you talk about the „intention „ of these business models. In the sense that as you say, there wasn’t so much the goal of creating financially sustainable products, but rather the hope of a short term gain from investors and founders.
0 likes • Mar 5
@David Finnegan do you think we will see that new (newly founded) product and service company will start from real customers‘ need and with a more solid revenue model in mind? Maybe they will now try to innovate the business and revenue models and not „just“ rely on investors „free money“. Am I being overly optimistic here? :)
Health and the power of communities
When it comes to health and well-being, there are issues to resolve and issues to manage. ❤️ Guess what helps – community! ❤️ The power of community is such, that just sharing your problems with someone gets an instant lift. 💡 Well, here is an insight. 😕 Got a critical health problem that needs resolving? Are you looking to make a go/no-go decision? knee replacement, IVF, lasik eye surgery ? - Communities rarely help. They add to the list of what-ifs and corner cases, and seemingly undeniable wisdom that advises against the decision. They increase apprehension. 👀 Got a health problem to manage? #Diet or #fitness issues, #IBS, posture management - communities are your friend, they are your guide. Hang by them, talk to them, do not let them go. Do you participate in communities online or offline, to manage health issues?
Poll
3 members have voted
1
6
New comment Mar 4
0 likes • Mar 4
@Chetna Samant may I ask the reason for this survey? is it part of a product research?
I find this interesting: Elon Musk suing OpenAi
Elon Musk has sued OpenAI. In Musk‘s opinion, OpenAI has broken the promise of „developing AI technology for the benefit of humanity“ going against its founding statements and principles. Instead, he claims, it is now acting purely in the interest of Microsoft's profits and market dominance. Whether the claim is true or not is a matter of debate, and this might also be one of Elon‘s PR stunts, although Musk has been very open and vocal when expressing his concerns regarding the risks related to AI technology. However, I find it interesting for different reasons: - This is a direct and concrete action with skin in the game by maybe pursuing legal action - The decision will be in the hands of the legal system and a judge. This could create maybe an interesting precedent. For example in a hypothetical and improbable scenario: What if the judge decides that the claim is legit and that OpenAI technology cannot be developed for profit but instead must be released open source? And that Microsoft has an ethical obligation to support this development? What about the opposite and dystopian scenario where „AI technology“becomes 100% property of tech companies creating a technocratic leadership? (Plenty of good sci-fi goes in this direction). - This might prompt an acceleration in policy development and regulatory intervention which will have a strong influence on shaping this technology for the future What do you think? Is this just noise or might be the seed of pivotal change (for good or bad)? Here is the article for reference: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/01/elon-musk-sues-openai-and-ceo-sam-altman-over-contract-breach.html
1
0
The first ONCE product from 37signals
You've probably already heard me talking about this, but the first ONCE product from 37signal is available now, it's called Campfire. The idea is that instead of paying for Slack forever, you pay for this once, I really hope more of these types of products take off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAzRUbE1AAw
5
20
New comment Feb 15
The first ONCE product from 37signals
1 like • Feb 2
@David Finnegan i am also curious to see how it develops. It is a very interesting move!
1 like • Feb 3
Thanks @Amr Khalifeh . They would also fit with the “vintage” (😂) licensing model
1-6 of 6
Davide Marchisio
2
10points to level up
@davide-marchisio-9133
Venture building, strategy definition, roadmaps, discovery, business models, circular transformation. I help companies in their product journey.

Active 14h ago
Joined Dec 4, 2023
Berlin
powered by