Why new algorithm ranks abandoned groups higher now?
Iโm all for helping more groups get discovered, but can someone please explain to me why the new discovery algorithm ranks an abandoned group like โB2B Scaleโ higher than โAccelerator Universityโ? #200 - B2B Scale โ https://www.skool.com/scale-your-b2b-company-3858/about #221 - Accelerator University โ https://www.skool.com/acceleratoruniversity (See attachments.) โB2B Scaleโ vs. โAccelerator Universityโ Status โ "Private" vs. "Public" Members โ 46 vs. 7,470 Online โ 1 vs. 130 Ranks โ #200 vs. #221 โB2B Scaleโ has 46 members, and only 1 is online, yet it is ranked #200 by the new algorithm. In addition, the creator of โB2B Scaleโ hasnโt even been active and last posted in May 2024. In comparison, my group, โAccelerator University,โ is one of the most active groups on Skool. We have 7,470 members and 130 are online now. Iโve been highly active for the last 9 months. One of my latest post has 61 comments and 53 likes. Iโm creating quality content and connections. If this new algorithm is supposed to reward retention on Skool, then something seems wrong. @Nivas K @Sam Ovens @Andrew Kirby @Eric Rodriguez @Sid Sahasrabuddhe